UBER IT
Uber’s relationships with cities tend to begin or end in war. Smaller markets experience the company as a powerful invading force — often a welcome one. The company’s model easily outclasses and undercuts provincial competitors, conscripting local cabbies and enlisting new drivers. Flimsy taxi regulations backed by weak municipal governments are quickly overwhelmed by the multibillion-dollar company and its armies of lawyers and lobbyists and their briefcases full of case studies and legislative suggestions.
But in larger markets with bigger taxi companies, municipal governments bristle at the company’s deep, evident disdain for their authority — and they’re capable of striking back. Last month, in a sudden show of force, London told Uber that its license to operate in the city wouldn’t be renewed. The city’s transit authority cited a number of reasons for its actions: Uber’s approach to reporting crimes; its background-check policies; its aggressive attempts to thwart regulators; general appeals to “public safety” and “corporate responsibility.”
“While Uber has revolutionized the way people move in cities around the world, it’s equally true computer repair center near me that we’ve got things wrong along the way,” Uber’s chief executive, Dara Khosrowshahi, wrote in a public letter. But this performance of contrition came on the heels of the company’s first effort at retaliation. It had already mobilized its drivers and users, starting a petition accusing the city of having “given in to a small number of people who want to restrict consumer choice,” of threatening the livelihoods of tens of thousands of its workers and of depriving millions of customers. The effort quickly garnered more than 800,000 signatures.
London’s threat to Uber is clearly existential: Being shut out of one of its largest markets is terrible for business and sets a dangerous precedent for the company as it tries to expand around the globe. But governments similarly perceive, in Uber, a broader challenge to their legitimacy. Uber doesn’t so much do business in cities as unilaterally install itself as infrastructure. Its incompatibilities with local regulations or national employment law are presented as neither features nor bugs but as evidence of evolution and progress. It identifies, vets and credentials drivers. It fields complaints and arbitrates disputes, exercising authority over those it deems bad actors. It lets riders rate drivers and vice versa, creating a sort of customer-service-centric accountability. Because Uber purports to be self-regulating, its users and drivers share in the company’s feeling that outside interference is unwelcome and even unnatural. It now has a constituency, hundreds of thousands strong, angry with their government on behalf of a corporation.
The same week Uber was given notice in London, Mark Zuckerberg sat down in front of a camera in Menlo Park, Calif. His desaturated earth-tone palette was matched color for color by his office in the background, as if to provide camouflage. Indeed, it was easy to miss the sheer range and strangeness of what he was there to say. “I care deeply about the democratic process and protecting its integrity,” he said. “The integrity of our elections is fundamental to democracy around the world.”
Facebook had recently disclosed that it believed Russian state actors purchased political ads during the 2016 election; more broadly, it had been accused of allowing disinformation and misinformation to thrive on its platform. Among the measures that Zuckerberg said his company would take included expanding “partnerships” with election commissions around the world and “working proactively to strengthen the democratic process.” Most striking, coming from the C.E.O. of a publicly traded American social-media company, was this line: “We have been working to ensure the integrity of the German elections this weekend.”
Social-media companies aren’t new to defending themselves in where to fix your computer ideological terms — they’re just not used to doing it on their home turf. While to authoritarian regimes, the threat of social media is obvious, in the United States, Facebook, Twitter and Google have for years talked about themselves freely in the language of democracy, participation and connectivity. The emerging tension between internet platforms and democratic governments, however, seems to stem less from their obvious rhetorical differences than from their similarities.
Facebook’s transition from a confident stride to a guarded crouch was conspicuous and sudden, arriving roughly at the same fix laptop screen near me | Toronto time as President Trump. Shortly after the 2016 election, Zuckerberg dismissed heated claims that misinformation on his platform had gotten Trump elected as a “pretty crazy idea.” In September, he admitted that his comment was dismissive, but did so after months of near-constant scrutiny, including, according to The Washington Post, a postelection lecture from President Obama. In an interview with Bloomberg published in September, he sounded more wistful than irritated: “For most of the existence of the company, this idea of connecting the world has not been a controversial thing,” desktop repair near me he said. “Something changed.” It certainly had: Facebook was being implicated as potentially harmful to the systems within which it had thrived, and with which it had sought to identify itself.
The problem was that Facebook had outgrown every context except its own. Though it neither thinks like nor resembles a government, it has effectively sewn itself into the fabric of users’ public and personal lives. Facebook accounts have now become something like IDs, enabling an ever-growing range of activities: commerce, job-seeking, leisure. Networks stand in for community; encryption, in owned and operated services like WhatsApp, stands in for guarantees of liberty; newsfeeds become sources of diverse information, including ads, yes, but also calls to register to vote — to apply elsewhere what you’ve increasingly experienced online.
All this is to say that a sufficiently successful social platform is experienced, much like Uber, as a piece of infrastructure. Except, instead of wrapping its marketplace around a city’s roads, Facebook makes a new market around communication, media and civil society. This, from a founder’s perspective, is an electrifying outcome. But this cultural metastasis has led to a swift and less-than-discriminate backlash. Already, calls for regulating the largest internet platforms are growing louder while remaining tellingly vague. After all, what can a government realistically do about a problem like Facebook?
It’s very likely that any approach to regulating Facebook will look more like diplomacy than anything else — a cautious search for détente with an institution that ultimately gets to set its own laws, whether a government likes it or not. Indeed, the company has been presenting itself as a willing, generous participant in American investigations, but more generally as a supranational, self-regulating force for good, and, boldly, as indispensable for the continuation of democracy around the world. “We will do our part not only to ensure the integrity of free and fair elections around the world,” Zuckerberg said, “but also to give everyone a voice and to be a force for good in democracy everywhere.” For citizen users, it’s a gesture of good faith. To skeptical countries, it’s a gentle declaration of independence, or maybe a dare. For Facebook, it’s something distinct, new and unmistakably statelike: a claim of sovereignty.
Social media privacy
I led Facebook’s efforts to fix privacy problems on its developer platform in advance of its 2012 initial public offering. What I saw from the inside was a company that prioritized data collection from its users over protecting them from abuse. As the world contemplates what to do about Facebook in the wake of its role in Russia’s election meddling, it must consider this history. Lawmakers shouldn’t allow Facebook to regulate itself. Because it won’t.
Facebook knows what you look like, your location, who your friends are, your interests, if you’re in a relationship or not, and what other pages you look at on the web. This data allows advertisers to target the more than one billion Facebook visitors a day. It’s no wonder the company has ballooned in size to a $500 billion behemoth in the five years since its I.P.O.
The more data it has on offer, the more value it creates for advertisers. That means it has no incentive to police the collection or use of that data — except when negative press or regulators are involved. Facebook is free to do almost whatever it wants with your personal information, and has no reason to put safeguards in place.
For a few years, Facebook’s developer platform hosted a thriving ecosystem of popular social games. Remember the age of Farmville and Candy Crush? The premise was simple: Users agreed to give game developers access to their data in exchange for free use of addictive games.
Unfortunately for the users of these games, there were no protections around the data they were passed through Facebook to outside developers. Once data went to the developer of a game, there was not much Facebook could do about misuse except to call the developer in question and threaten to cut off the developer’s access. As the I.P.O. approached, and the media reported on allegations of misuse of data, I, as manager of the team responsible for protecting users on the developer platform from abuse of their data, was given the task of solving the problem.
In one instance, a developer appeared to be using Facebook data to automatically generate profiles of children, without their consent. When I called the company responsible for the app, it claimed that Facebook’s policies on data use were not being violated, but we had no way to confirm whether that was true. Once data passed from the platform to a developer, Facebook had no view of the data or control over it. In other cases, developers asked for permission to get user data that their apps obviously didn’t need — such as a social game asking for all of your photos and messages. People rarely read permissions request forms carefully, so they often authorize access to sensitive information hard drive recovery toronto without realizing it.
At a company that was deeply concerned about protecting its users, this situation would have been met with a robust effort to cut off developers who were making questionable use of data. But when I was at Facebook, the typical reaction I recall looked like this: try to put any negative press coverage to bed as quickly as possible, with no sincere Great post to read efforts to put safeguards in place or to identify and stop abusive developers. When I proposed a deeper audit of developers’ use of Facebook’s data, one executive asked me, “Do you really want to see what you’ll find?”
The message was clear: The company just wanted negative stories to stop. It didn’t really care how the data was used.
When Russians decided to target Americans during the 2016 election, they didn’t buy TV or newspaper ads, or hire a skywriter. They turned to Facebook, where their content reached at least 126 million Americans. The fact that Facebook prioritized data collection over user protection and regulatory compliance is precisely what made it so attractive. Now the company is arguing that it should be allowed to regulate itself to prevent this from happening again. My experience shows that it should not.
Facebook’s chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, mentioned in an October interview with Axios that one of the ways the company uncovered Russian propaganda ads was by identifying that they had been purchased in rubles. Given how easy this was, it seems clear the discovery could have come much sooner than it did — a year after the election. But apparently Facebook took the same approach to this investigation as the one I observed during my tenure: react only when the press or regulators make something an issue, and avoid any changes that would hurt the business of collecting and selling data.
This makes for a dangerous mix: a company that reaches most of the country every day and has the most detailed set of personal data ever assembled, but has no incentive to prevent abuse. Facebook needs to be regulated more tightly, or broken up where can i get my laptop screen fixed so that no single entity controls all of its data. The desktop computer repair near me | Toronto company won’t protect us by itself, and nothing less than our democracy is at stake.
Data recovery
Have you had a hard drive failure and in the need to recover your hard disk data files? Well the first thing you macbook computer repair near me | Toronto need to know is recovering your data files is very possible and you can perform this task your self. If you have had physical damage to your hard disk like fire or hard disk melt down you should not perform iphone screen repair toronto this task your self. Data recovery performed on your hard drive disk is possible even when your files have been deleted from recycle bin.
When files are deleted from your hard disk the file still remains in the Learn more here computers system but just does not show in your computers registry. Files that have been deleted or corrupted and removed can be recovered if the file has not been over written with a new file. What are the chances of you recovering your file? See file recovery is very likely but you need to act fast in recovering your files so files don't get over written on.
Hard drive crashes are the cause of viruses Trojan attacks or even physical damage or even over heating. It is very important that data is backed up in preventing the permanent data memory loss. Even though we can perform data recovery we need make sure we have systems in play just in case files are over written and can not perform recovery.
Finding the best data recovery tool is very important to find the best results. There are a range of file recovery tools in the market, The good companies let you download the computer repair near me product for free and it will scan your computer for the files that can be recovered before your purchase it. I reviewed the data recovery tool by Pareto logic and I can recommend to be used. The software provides a friendly step by step user interface to perform successful recovery of the data on your hard drive disk.
Smart Car Knowledge
Smart is a subsidiary of Daimler AG that creates the "smart" model, a two or four computer repair shop near me seat vehicle that is aimed especially for urban use. The first Smart vehicles were produced by the Swatch Swiss watch manufacturer.
They wanted a very small car that could be easy to drive and park in the crowded European cities. They also wanted the car to be cheap enough for young people to afford it. From 2006 onward, all the Smart models are being created and sold by the Mercedes-Benz automobile group, while intended as a cheap and affordable mini, the Smart was too expensive for young people and it became somewhat as a fashion statement. There are several Smart models sold: the Fortwo, the Forfour and until 2005 there was a cabriolet model.
In many parts of Europe the Smart, especially the Fortwo model (as its name implies, it can carry only two passengers) was a success, while the Fortwo model was taken out of production recently. However, many people are asking if the Smart car could become a success in America, the home country of full size SUVs and powerful V-8 engines.
Until recently, the Smart models could not be imported legally in the US as they did not meet the American emissions regulations. All of the models that could laptop repair near me | Toronto be found on the market were modified so they cost to fix macbook pro screen could pass the emissions tests.
However, the Mercedes-Benz automobile group has developed new engines for their 2008 model, so it could be sold throughout the world. The question remains though if the US market is ready for the Smart car.
Its supporters say it is the best city car in the world, as it is only 106.1 in long and it can be parked almost anywhere in the city center. Its small engine is powerful enough for urban needs, however it lacks the power for long highway cruises. The smart car has a titanium structure, making it the safest mini car on the market.
However, there are people that say the Smart has poor value as it has several disadvantages. First, it can only carry two people (the driver and a single passenger), while some of its competitors car carry five people in full comfort. In the same time its relatively short wheelbase (73.5 in) means that the smart car is very uncomfortable, especially on poor roads. The first models were also speed limited, as they could become unstable as high speeds. However, the 2008 model is safer, more comfortable and fun to drive.
Its critics say that despite its 1L engine, the smart car does not boost a significant fuel economy and the Toyota Prius offers significantly lower fuel consumption, especially around town.
However, the Toyota Prius is a hybrid model and among the non-hybrids, the smart car has been declared the most fuel efficient car in the U.S. in the Federal Government's 2008 Fuel Economy Guide. The smart car can be a very fun car to drive, especially if you do not consider being in such a small car a major inconvenience.
HTC One X+
HTC One X+ is the successor of the extremely popular HTC One X. HTC's latest flagship phone brings in a lot of improvements on the hardware and UI front. The phone has the dimensions 134.4 x 69.9 x 8.9 mm which is the same as its laptop repair toronto predecessor. The design of the phone is compact and fits easily into one's palm. It is also very lightweight at 135 grams.
HTC One X+ features NVIDIA where to repair macbook pro Tegra 3 AP37 chipset and is powered by a Quad-core 1 GHz processor and 1 GB RAM. Graphics is handled by ULP GeForce processor. It has a 4.7 inches Super LCD2 capacitive touchscreen display which has a resolution of 720 x 1280 pixels and pixel density of 312 ppi. The screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 2 which is upto 20% thinner than the earlier version. The handset features Google's latest version (v4.1.1) of Android (Jelly Bean) and HTC's improved HTC Sense user interface version 4+. Connectivity features include GPRS, EDGE, HSDPA, HSUPA, Wi-Fi, Bluetoth version 4.0 with A2DP and microUSB v2.0. Multimedia features include MP3/eAAC+/WMA/WAV music player, MP4/H.263/H.264/WMV video player, FM radio and much more. The phone is DLNA enabled which means you can access and play videos and songs from other devices directly from the phone itself.
HTC One X+ comes with a 8 mega pixels camera which can take images upto a resolution of 3264 x 2448 pixels and record high definition videos of 1080 pixels at 30 frames per second. There is a secondary camera of 1.6 megapixels at the front of the phone for video conferencing. Users can also simultaneously record HD videos and images. Other features include Informative post face and smile detection, Best photo mode, HDR mode, geo-tagging, touch focus, continuous auto focus, panorama and much more. You can upload your photos and videos directly to websites like Facebook, Picassa, Instagram,etc. right after recording them on the phone. Social networking best computer store toronto features are integrated into the phone's interface. Pre-installed apps on the phone include Google Maps, Google Talk, Youtube, Gmail, Google Search, document viewer, organizer, calculator, alarm clock and many more. Messaging features include threaded view SMS, MMS, Email, instant messaging and push Email. Users can access the internet using the inbuilt HTML5 browser. The phone has a standard Li-Ion 2100 mAh battery which performs well even with heavy use.
HTC One X+ offers notable improvements over its predecessor and is undoubtedly one of the best smartphones available in the market.
Tools Needed For A Laptop Teardown and Diagnostic
Screwdrivers
With a simple set of screwdrivers you can perform a lot of different of repairs on a laptop. You can use a basic set that does not cost more than six dollars. If you want something that looks a little bit more professional you can look at some different options. Then you can purchase a fifteen dollar kit that has one screwdriver with lots of different bits. If the laptop repair that is being done on your computer deals with the inside of your laptop then computer repair toronto they will need to use a screwdriver to remove the casing on the bottom.
Small Tools
There are several small tools your local laptop repair man will need to do maintenance on computers. The hard drive data recovery toronto first one is a nylon pry tool. It is a long and skinny metal tool that has a very pointed tip. This is used to remove plastic flexible pieces without damaging them. The next thing they will need is a tool called a hemostat. This is basically a set of small tweezers that look like a tiny set of scissors. This tool is useful to work on small pieces that your fingers cannot reach. It is also who fixes computers helpful if you drop a small screw or wire into the computer. Then where to fix computer you will be able to get it back without tearing anything inside the computer up.
Multi-meter
The more expensive tool you will need is a multi-meter. The laptop repair personnel will use this tool to check that the laptop has an adamant amount of power. These will usually run around twenty dollars or more depending on the size that they purchase. This can be very helpful, and save a lot of time when they are diagnosing your laptop.
Instead of diagnosing the pc by yourself, laptop repair should be done by people who are very educated in the field, or by people who just decide that they want to do it. You should definitely do some research when looking for someone to fix your laptop. You want laptop repair to be done by the most competent person possible.
Tools Needed For A Laptop Teardown and Diagnostic
Screwdrivers
With a simple set of screwdrivers you can perform a lot of different of repairs on a laptop. You can use a basic set that does not cost more than six dollars. If you want something that looks a little bit more professional you can look at some different options. Then you can purchase a fifteen dollar kit that has one screwdriver with hard drive data recovery toronto lots of different bits. If the laptop repair that is being done on your computer deals with the inside of your laptop then they will need to use a screwdriver to remove the casing on the who fixes computers bottom.
Small Tools
There are several small tools your local laptop repair man will need to do maintenance computer repair toronto on computers. The first one is a nylon pry tool. It is a long and skinny metal tool that has a very pointed tip. This is used to remove plastic flexible pieces without damaging them. The next thing they will need is a tool called a hemostat. This is basically a set of small tweezers that look like a tiny set of scissors. This tool is useful to work on small pieces that your fingers cannot reach. It is also helpful if you drop a small screw or wire into the computer. Then you will be able to get it back without tearing anything inside the computer up.
Multi-meter
The more expensive tool you will need is a multi-meter. The laptop repair personnel will use this tool to check that the laptop has an adamant amount of power. These will usually run around twenty dollars or more depending on the size that they purchase. This can be very helpful, and save a lot of time when they are diagnosing your laptop.
Instead of diagnosing the pc by yourself, laptop repair should be done by people who are very educated in the field, or by people who just decide that they want to do it. You should definitely do some research when looking for someone to fix your laptop. You want laptop repair to be done by where to fix computer the most competent person possible.
